Strong Output, Slower Hiring: A Look at Recent Economic Trends

submitted by Uric Dufrene, Ph.D., Sanders Chair in Business, Indiana University Southeast
 

The current macroeconomy has been described by some as a “no hire–no fire” economy. Gross domestic product (GDP), a measure of the market value of goods and services produced, has been strong, with third-quarter estimates now at 4.4%. In the most recent quarter, growth was driven primarily by a combination of the resilient consumer, and a reversal of the import surge observed during the first quarter of the year.

Despite the strong growth, comparable gains have not followed in the labor market. Payroll growth has slowed significantly from last year, and hiring activity has declined. Layoffs, however, have not surged. In fact, layoffs remain at historically low levels and well below arecession threshold of roughly 350,000 initial claims per week. Employers, it seems, are holding onto workers, but are increasingly reluctant to add new ones.

Closer to home, we are observing similar patterns across the State of Indiana. The latest state GDP report shows robust 5.1% growth in the third quarter, the strongest quarterly growth since late 2023. Yet job gains for both 2024 and 2025 are running at the slowest pace of the past decade, excluding the sharp losses associated with the COVID recession. Year over year, Indiana payroll employment is ahead by roughly 19,000 jobs, below both pre-pandemic and post-pandemic averages of approximately 27,000 and 38,000 jobs, respectively.

Interestingly, 2019 produced the third-weakest year for job growth over the past decade, with payrolls rising by only about 20,000 jobs. That year followed the implementation of tariffs in 2018, including those on steel and aluminum, an important point of reference for today.

Nearly all the jobs added over the past year in Indiana came from healthcare, which accounted for roughly 17,000 of the 19,000 net jobs gained. Other notable gains came from professional and business services, which added about 9,000 jobs, and construction, which contributed another 3,000.

Indiana remains a national hub for both manufacturing and logistics. Both sectors are particularly sensitive to trade policy, and both struggled in 2025. Transportation and warehousing shed approximately 4,000 jobs over the year, while manufacturing employment was essentially flat. For manufacturing, however, 2025 represented something of a stabilization year following losses of roughly 14,000 and 10,000 jobs in the prior two years.

Turning to Louisville Metro, the latest data show that payroll growth has modestly accelerated in the second half of the year. While the most recent figures show a net gain of about 2,000 jobs over the year, average monthly gains in the second half exceeded those seen earlier in the year. Unlike Indiana, healthcare is no longer the dominant job-creation sector in Louisville Metro, adding fewer than 1,000 jobs in 2025. Last year, Louisville healthcare drove a significant component of overall job growth.

Like Indiana, Louisville is both a manufacturing region and a logistics hub, and both sectors experienced job losses over the past year. Manufacturing employment declined only slightly, but transportation and warehousing shed approximately 2,000 jobs. Construction, by contrast, added more than 2,000 jobs.

Taken together, 2025 stands out as one of the slowest years for job growth for both Indiana and Louisville Metro. Higher interest rates initially weighed on manufacturing activity beginning in 2022. More recently, however, the impact of tariffs appears to be a growing headwind for both the Indiana economy and the Louisville Metro area. Tariff-sensitive sectors such as manufacturing and transportation and warehousing have borne the brunt of these effects. With GDP growth running strong and consumer spending remaining resilient, tariffs increasingly stand out as a key factor holding back job growth.

Advocacy Update 1.21.2026

We are continuing to learn and monitor policies that may impact our local region. The goal of our Advocacy Agenda is to articulate the opportunities and concerns of Southern Indiana businesses and to speak for them as one voice. 

Our Advocacy Committee continues to meet and discuss relevant bills to our local businesses and constituents. Together, they look forward to going to the statehouse next week where they will speak with elected officials on behalf of the bills and priorities they are monitoring. In the meantime, our Advocacy Committee looks forward to learning more about other bills and local priorities to track in our upcoming advocacy updates. 

We encourage everyone to see upcoming deadlines

  • Monday January 26 – Latest Day session must reconvene (IC 2-2.1-1-3) 
  • Thursday January 29 – Last day for 3rd reading of Senate bills in Senate 
  • Thursday January 29 – Last Day for 3rd reading of House bills in the House. 

 

Bills we are monitoring: 

SB 283 Regional Development Tax Credit 

Status: 

  • 1/12/2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Tax and Fiscal Policy 
  • 1/12/2026: Authored by Senators Mishler, Niezgodski 

HB 1101 Regional Economic Development 

Status: 

  • 1/05/2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means 
  • 1/05/2026: Coauthored by Representatives Snow, Lehman 
  • 1/05/202: Authored by Representative Heine 

HB 1164 Tax Increment Financing Districts 

Status: 

  • 1/05/2026: First Reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means 
  • 1/05/2026: Authored by Representative Rowray 

 

Bills we oppose: 

HB 1104 Nondisclosure Agreements in Economic Development 

Status: 

  • 1/12/2026: Representative Commons added as coauthor 
  • 1/05/2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Government and Regulatory Reform 
  • 1/05/2026: Authored by Representative Greene 

 

You can find a copy of the 1si 2026 Advocacy Agenda by visiting https://1si.org/advocacy/ or downloading a PDF copy here. 

Strengthening Our Collective Voice: IEDA Announces 2026 Leadership

New Albany, IN – January 20, 2026 – At the Indiana Economic Development Association (IEDA) Annual Meeting this December, a community of practitioners came together not just to reflect on a year of progress, but to empower the leaders who will guide a shared mission forward.

They are proud to announce the election of their new Board Members and Officers for the upcoming year. These individuals represent the heart of Indiana’s economic development profession—bringing diverse expertise from urban centers to rural towns, all united by a single goal: creating opportunity for every Hoosier.

“The Indiana Economic Development Association has been a critical resource and catalyst for collaborative growth in the State of Indiana since 1968, and it is a distinct honor to serve my peers and state as Board Chair,” said the newly elected Board Chair, John Launius. “The IEDA, alongside a membership rich with expertise and experience, will continue to advocate, educate, and ensure statewide connectivity of economic development professionals and partners. I am humbled and excited to serve my peers, partners, and the State of Indiana in such a meaningful way.”

Leading the Way Together
The following leaders were elected by the membership to serve as advocates, mentors, and voices for 2026:

New Officers:
Chair: John Launius, One Southern Indiana
Vice Chair: Bethany Hartley, South Bend – Elkhart Regional Partnership
Secretary: Tenille Zartman, Grow Wabash County
Treasurer: Bryan Brackemyre, Indiana Municipal Power Agency

New Board Members:
Rachel Huser, Wabash Valley Power Alliance
Corey Murphy, New Castle Henry County Econ. Dev. Corp.
Chris Pfaff, Knox County Indiana Economic Development

###

A Note from the IEDA
Economic development is more than just transactions; it’s about the people behind the progress. As Indiana’s only statewide association dedicated to this profession, IEDA serves as a “professional home” where practitioners find the credibility, belonging, and tools they need to thrive.

When our members are supported, their communities are stronger. We welcome these new leaders to the helm as we continue to share knowledge, influence policy, and invest in the leadership development that ensures long-term prosperity in every corner of our state.

About IEDA
Since 1968, the Indiana Economic Development Association (IEDA) has been the united voice for the people building Indiana’s future. Representing over 400 members across local organizations, agencies, and corporations, we are a member-driven network focused on connection and growth. We provide the training and advocacy that empower professionals to turn vision into reality.

For more information on how we’re building opportunity together, visit www.ieda.org.
Media Contact: Jill Ewing, (317) 454-7013

About One Southern Indiana 
One Southern Indiana (1si) was formed in July of 2006 as the economic development organization and chamber of commerce serving Clark and Floyd counties. 1si’s mission is to help businesses innovate and thrive in the Southern Indiana / Louisville metro area via the three pillars of Business Resources, Economic Development, and Advocacy. For more information on One Southern Indiana, visit www.1si.org.
Media Contact: Ellinor Smith, (812) 206-9029

1si Non-Profit Spotlight: Guerin Woods & Providence House

Guerin Woods & Providence House provides income-based senior living for independent individuals and a unique residential family reunification program for families involved with the Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS). Their founders had a vision of a multi-generational campus that would uplift one another as individuals move along in their journey of life. Watch the video below to learn more about their mission and how you can support them.

Advocacy Update 1.14.2026

6We are continuing to learn and monitor policies that may impact our local region. This week, Lance Allison (President & CEO of 1si) and Melissa Sprigler (Director of Investor Relations), headed up to the state house to distribute the 1si Advocacy Agenda. The goal of our Advocacy Agenda is to articulate the opportunities and concerns of Southern Indiana businesses and to speak for them as one voice. 

Our Advocacy Committee continues to meet and discuss relevant bills to our local businesses and constituents. This year, 753 bills were committed for review, and we have identified early-stage bills that we will continue to monitor for updates. In the meantime, our Advocacy Committee looks forward to learning more about other bills and local priorities to track in our upcoming advocacy updates. 

We encourage everyone to see upcoming deadlines

  • Friday January 16 – Last day Senate bills may be assigned to Senate committees. 
  • Monday January 26 – Latest day session must be reconvened ( IC 2-2. 1-1-3) 
  • Thursday January 29 – Last day for 3rd reading of Senate bills in Senate 
  • Thursday January 29 – Last Day for 3rd reading of House bills in the House. 

 

Bills we are monitoring: 

HB 1101 Regional Economic Development 

Status: 

  • 1/05/2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means 
  • 1/05/2026: Coauthored by Representatives Snow, Lehman 
  • 1/05/202: Authored by Representative Heine 

 

HB 1164 Tax Increment Financing Districts 

Status: 

  • 1/05/2026: First Reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means 
  • 1/05/2026: Authored by Representative Rowray 

 

Bills we oppose: 

HB 1104 Nondisclosure Agreements in Economic Development 

Status:

  • 1/12/2026: Representative Commons added as coauthor 
  • 1/05/2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Government and Regulatory Reform 
  • 1/05/2026: Authored by Representative Greene 

 

You can find a copy of the 1si 2026 Advocacy Agenda by visiting https://1si.org/advocacy/ or downloading a PDF copy here. 

A Growing Economy, a Stalled National Labor Market

submitted by Uric Dufrene, Ph.D., Sanders Chair in Business, Indiana University Southeast

The “dot-com” recession of the early 2000s and the Great Recession of 2007 to 2009 have both been described as “jobless recoveries.” In each case, economic growth, as measured by GDP, returned to positive territory as the recession ended, but job growth lagged for years afterward.

During the 2001 tech-driven recession, employment continued to decline through mid-2003, even though the economy had already resumed growth. Following the housing-led Great Recession, employment did not return to its pre-crisis level until 2014, nearly five years after the recession officially ended.

Fast forward to today.

We are now approaching the one-year anniversary of so-called “Liberation Day,” when a sweeping and unprecedented increase in taxes on consumption — in the form of tariffs — was rolled out with the stated goal of “liberating” the American worker and bringing jobs back to the United States, particularly in manufacturing. At the time, press accounts highlighted optimistic projections from officials, who spoke confidently about sizable job gains in the second half of 2025 driven by reshoring and small-business hiring.

Instead, as we enter early 2026, the U.S. economy appears to be on the verge of something different — a jobless boom.

Why jobless, and why a boom?

Start with the labor market. Payroll growth slowed dramatically in the second half of 2025, nearly grinding to a halt. On a year-over-year basis, job growth remained below 1 percent throughout the second half of the year, with the most recent report showing growth of just 0.4 percent.

To put that in historical context, we must go all the way back to the early 1980s to find a similar combination of sub-1 percent job growth occurring outside of an active recession. Even then, that period was sandwiched between two back-to-back recessions. Outside of that episode, year-over-year job growth below 1 percent has almost always been associated with the lead-up to a recession, the recession itself, or the immediate aftermath.

And yet, we are not currently in a recession.

GDP growth did turn negative in the first quarter of 2025, but for a very specific reason. Faced with the looming implementation of tariffs, businesses and consumers rushed to stockpile imported goods. Because imports subtract from GDP, that surge temporarily pulled growth into negative territory. Once that front-loading faded in subsequent quarters, GDP growth rebounded.

In fact, growth came roaring back. Heavy investment in artificial intelligence and data-center infrastructure, along with resilient consumer spending, pushed third-quarter GDP growth above 4 percent. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker currently projects growth above 5 percent for the fourth quarter of 2025. In short, while the labor market is clearly showing strain, the broader economy is anything but recessionary.

So how do we reconcile robust growth with such weak job performance?

On the growth side, the answer lies in a combination of strong consumer spending, massive AI-related investment, and the unwinding of trade distortions tied to tariffs. In the third quarter alone, consumer spending and net exports accounted for roughly 93 percent of total GDP growth.

The labor market, however, tells a more troubling story beneath the surface. Initial unemployment claims remain subdued and well below recessionary levels, suggesting that widespread layoffs are not occurring. But continuing claims continue to rise, increasing by 56,000 in the most recent report. The number of long-term unemployed, those out of work for 27 weeks or longer, has climbed by nearly 400,000 over the past year. The number of people working part-time for economic reasons has increased by almost one million, and those not in the labor force who still want a job are up by nearly 700,000.

These are not recession numbers, but they are not healthy numbers either.

The fundamental question now is how long the consumer can continue to carry the economy in the absence of meaningful job growth. Whether the forces at work are AI-driven productivity gains, tariff-related uncertainty, inflation fatigue, or some combination of all three, a sputtering job engine will eventually constrain household income growth. And without sustained income growth, consumer resilience will fade.

A jobless recovery is one thing. A jobless boom may be something entirely new, and far more fragile.

Advocacy Update | 1.07.2026

New year, new priorities! One Southern Indiana (1si) has now published our 2026 Advocacy Agenda. The release of the agenda coincides with the start of the 2026 Session of the Indiana General Assembly, which officially began. Weekly emails will begin next week to keep members up to date on legislation we are following, and that may impact you and your business. See the upcoming deadlines to keep in mind as the session moves forward. 

  • Wednesday, January 7 – Senators may file only two bills per business day beginning today 
  • Wednesday January 7 – Deadline for filing House bills not later than 2:00 p.m. 
  • Friday January 9 – Deadline for filing Senate bills not later than 4:00 p.m. 
  • Friday January 16 – Last day Senate bills may be assigned to Senate committees.

We look forward to kicking off our yearly events with the Advocacy State Leadership Breakfast, hosted at Prosser Career Education Center, and sponsored by the following organizations: 

  • Presenting Sponsor: MAC Construction 
  • Platinum Sponsor: AT&T, Baptist Health, Duke Energy, Meta 
  • Gold Sponsors: Dan Cristiani Excavating Co. Inc. and Metro United Way 
  • Silver Sponsor: Frost Brown Todd 

Thank You for Renewing Your Membership | December 2025

One Southern Indiana would like to thank the following members for renewing their membership during the month of December 2025.

Quarter Century Club (25 years or more)Member Since
PC Home Center1978
Stites & Harbison, PLLC1982
Libs Paving Co., Inc.1990
Norton Healthcare1994
Hope Southern Indiana, Inc.1998
Rock Creek Community Academy1998
  
10-24 Years 
Business Health Plus, Inc.2003
LL&A Interior Design2005
R. H. Clarkson Insurance Group2007
Peyton’s Barricade & Sign Co.2008
Mediaura2008
Dean Dorton Allen Ford, PLLC2008
FormWood Industries, Inc.2009
Kentuckiana Wood Products, Inc.2011
ATS Integrated Solutions, Inc.2013
Peyton Technical Services, LLC2013
Schimpff’s Confectionery2014
Purdue Polytechnic New Albany, Purdue University2014
A Plus Paper Shredding2014
Clarksville Strike & Spare Family Fun Center2015
  
5-9 Years 
Down Syndrome of Louisville Indiana Campus2016
King’s-Quality Restoration Services LLC2017
Tree of Life Family Birth Center2018
Gaylor Electric2018
Louisville Regional Airport Authority2018
Purple Pearl Skin & Beauty2018
Vision First Eye Care – Jeffersonville2019
Excel Excavating, Incorporated2020
J.F. Hilliard Company LLC2020
Board and You Bistro2020
  
2-4 Years 
Magnet Culture2021
Lewen Line Construction2021
KORT Physical Therapy – Madison2021
KORT Physical Therapy – Madison2021
Xtreme Transportation2021
Kentuckiana Regional Planning & Development Agency (KIPDA)2021
Lead Well Strategic Consulting2022
CyberdomeUSA2022
The Villages at Historic Silvercrest2022
Zach Wedding, Realtor- Six Degrees Real Estate2022
Redemption Solar and Roofing2022
Access Justice2023
Dock Seafood Inc2023
Clark Station Shopping Center2023
Classic Truss and Wood Components, Inc.2023
Odyssey Financial Group – Travis Nicks2023
Merrick Printing Co., Inc.2023
Kim Cruises, LLC2023
stayAPT Suites Louisville North-Clarksville2023
Schindler’s Garage2023
ROOFTECH2023
  
One Year 
Clark County Youth Shelter and Family Services, Inc.2024
Primavera & Associates2024
P.U.S.H. Transportation Company LLC2024
Flats of River Ridge2024
RK Bluegrass2024
KCS Foundation and Waterproofing Specialist2024
Marco Company2024
Bass Group Real Estate2024
Idealogy Marketing + Design2024
ADE Food African Kitchen & Catering Services2024
Lumos2024
Laswell Electric Company Inc.2024

From Dot-Coms to Data Center: What Past Booms Can Teach Us About AI

submitted by Uric Dufrene, Ph.D., Sanders Chair in Business, Indiana University Southeast
 

Are there similarities between what we are seeing today with artificial intelligence, and the massive investment required to build the data-center infrastructure that supports it, and the dot-com collapse or the housing crisis that led to the Great Recession? It’s a reasonable question, and one worth examining.

To answer it, we need to go back to the late 1990s.

As the calendar approached the year 2000, companies poured billions of dollars into technology upgrades to prepare for Y2K. Dire predictions circulated about elevators failing and planes falling from the sky when the clock rolled over to January 1, 2000. None of that happened. But the investment surge was real.

At the same time, the internet was rapidly gaining traction. Businesses were building websites, consumers were beginning to shop online, and entirely new business models emerged that relied exclusively on the internet. Innovation was real, but so was speculation. Stock prices soared, especially in technology shares. The NASDAQ Composite nearly doubled between 1998 and its peak in early 2000.

When earnings and profits failed to match lofty expectations, valuations collapsed. Remember the infamous pets.com. The NASDAQ ultimately fell nearly 80% from peak to trough, contributing to the 2001 recession. It would take roughly 15 years for the index to fully recover the value lost during the dot-com implosion.

As always, investors then went searching for returns elsewhere. Capital flows to the highest rate of return, adjusting for risk.

In the mid-2000s, that search increasingly led to structured mortgage products, most notably mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. These instruments pooled mortgage payments and passed the cash flows through to investors. Because housing prices had risen steadily for decades, these securities were widely viewed as lower risk.

Demand surged. To meet it, lenders originated more mortgages, often with weaker underwriting standards. Adjustable-rate mortgages proliferated, loan-to-value ratios climbed, and in some cases mortgages exceeded the value of the homes themselves. As long as home prices kept rising, the system appeared stable. 

That stability proved illusory. When interest rates reset higher and borrowers began missing payments, the cash flows supporting these securities deteriorated. Losses spread quickly through the financial system, triggering the 2008 financial crisis and the Great Recession, the most severe economic contraction since the Great Depression. The pets.com implosion years earlier ultimately turned into the Great Recession. 

So how does artificial intelligence fit into this historical comparison?

Once again, we are witnessing massive investment tied to transformative technology. Hundreds of billions of dollars—and potentially more than a trillion globally over the coming decade—are being invested in data centers, power infrastructure, and advanced semiconductor capacity to support AI. These investments are helping fuel equity markets, with a small group of large technology firms—the so-called “Magnificent Seven”—accounting for a disproportionate share of recent stock market gains.

As in prior cycles, leverage is playing a role. Much of this build-out is being financed with debt. While some of that debt is long-term, concerns are emerging about mismatches between financing structures and the underlying assets. Data centers may last decades, but the chips inside them often have useful lives measured in just a few years. Financing rapidly depreciating technology with long-dated debt introduces risk.

Markets have already shown sensitivity to that risk. Recently, disappointing news from a handful of AI-infrastructure firms triggered sharp reactions in equity prices. High expectations are embedded in today’s valuations, and much must go right for projected returns to materialize. Ultimately, someone must service the debt and deliver returns to capital providers.

That does not mean an AI-driven collapse is inevitable. There are important differences from past cycles. Many of today’s leading technology firms are profitable, cash-rich, and generating real revenue growth. AI is delivering tangible productivity gains, not just speculative promise.

Still, history offers a cautionary lesson. Periods of transformative innovation are often accompanied by overinvestment, financial excess, and unrealistic expectations. When returns fail to materialize as quickly or as broadly as hoped, markets adjust—sometimes abruptly.

The risk is not artificial intelligence itself. The risk lies in how aggressively it is being financed, how optimistic the assumptions have become, and whether capital discipline is maintained. History doesn’t repeat, but it often rhymes—and investors would be wise to remember that as the AI investment cycle continues to unfold.